Comparison to other methods

imagepac compared to the conventional pouring liquid photopolymer method:

imagepac compared to sheet photopolymer:
• imagepac is lower in cost
• imagepac is water washable and has better health and safety
• imagepac is much quicker, taking a fraction of the time to expose, wash out and dry

imagepac compared to vulcanizing rubber:
• imagepac is much lower cost, until you have made over three repetitions of the matrix board
• imagepac is much faster, taking approximately 1/6th of the time
• imagepac does not produce a strong odour or any risk of operator burning
• imagepac uses very little electricity

imagepac compared to laser engraved rubber:
• The imagepac exposure unit is significantly lower cost
• The imagepac exposure unit does not require expensive maintenance
• The imagepac exposure unit does not require expensive extraction equipment 
• imagepac is considerably faster to make
• imagepac does not produce fumes

imagepac compared to flash:
• imagepac is much lower cost
• The exposure unit is much lower cost
• imagepac can be made in large format, producing many stamps at the same time
• imagepac stamps can be inked straight after manufacture.
• imagepac can be used with daters